ISPI HPT Case Competition 2026 ↗

IroncladCollective.

We don't guess at solutions. We diagnose the real problem — then build a system to fix it. Performance consultants diagnosing and solving a workforce crisis in the U.S. maritime industry.

Human Performance Technology Workforce Development Maritime Industry Root Cause Analysis Workforce Stability
The Engagement
HarborTech Marine Services
A ten-week HPT consulting engagement. One company. One damaging belief. Four cascading system failures.
HPT Define Statement
Supervisors, foremen, and apprentices at HarborTech Marine Services are unable to develop and retain the skilled workforce capacity required to meet production demands because HMS operates under an embedded organizational assumption that labor is easily replaceable — resulting in a 28% annual turnover rate, 35%+ entry-level attrition, compounding schedule slippage, and a self-reinforcing cycle of burnout and workforce instability.

The Challenge

HarborTech Marine Services — a ~420-person maritime trades company in Hampton Roads, VA — is hemorrhaging people and expertise despite strong contract demand. The belief driving every bad decision: "The pipeline is strong enough to replace losses." It isn't. And no one has been willing to say so. Until now.

28% annual turnover. 35% attrition among entry-level apprentices — 25% higher than the broader workforce rate. Strong contracts. An empty bench.

Key Findings

  • Workforce Instability: 28% annual turnover; 35%+ entry-level attrition — a gap 7 points above the broader workforce rate, costing 50–200% of each lost employee's annual salary in replacement costs (SHRM).
  • Supervisory Time Misalignment: Supervisors spend 70–80% of their time on production and only 5–10% on mentoring — a roughly 10:1 ratio. Development is structurally crowded out before the shift starts.
  • Development Is Unmeasured: Mentoring and apprentice progression appear in zero of five formal supervisor evaluation categories. What isn't measured isn't managed.
  • The Root Cause Belief: An embedded organizational assumption that labor is easily replaceable drives every decision that trades long-term capability for short-term output. The system was designed to replace Marcus, not retain him.
  • Regional Labor Pressure: Hampton Roads has 11,000+ open maritime positions today and needs 28,000–34,000 skilled trades hires by 2030. The external pipeline will not bail out an internal development failure.

Proposed Interventions

  • Meso — Incentive Realignment: Restructure supervisor evaluation criteria to formally include mentoring time and apprentice progression alongside production, safety, and quality — making workforce development a measured job requirement.
  • Meso — Governance & Training: Introduce a Workforce Development Manager, Team Lead roles, and a Workforce Stability Dashboard (WSD) with a Decision Gate system — establishing the governance, accountability structures, and oversight required to treat talent pipeline management as a production requirement.
  • Micro — Workload Rebalancing: Reduce unsustainable overtime dependency, clarify role expectations, and build supervisory capacity — creating conditions where workers have the time, support, and stability to develop and stay.
  • Macro — Regional Alignment: Partner with the Hampton Roads Workforce Council (HRWC) and the Regional Maritime Training System (RMTS) to leverage public funding, align curricula with shop-floor requirements, and access the regional talent pipeline.

Our Methodology

  • Phase One — Front-End Analysis: Applied Fishbone (Ishikawa) analysis, the Rummler-Brache Nine Boxes, and Binder's Six Boxes to map desired vs. actual performance and identify systemic drivers across the HMS workforce system.
  • Phase Two — Root Cause Diagnosis: Separated training from non-training causes across five identified performance gaps; traced all five to one validated systemic root cause — the replaceable workforce mental model.
  • Phase Three — Intervention Design: Selected four integrated interventions across micro, meso, and macro system levels; prioritized structural and non-training solutions given the nature of the root cause.
  • Phase Four — Prototype & Validation: Developed proof-of-concept tools including a supervisor evaluation redesign, an apprenticeship milestone framework, and a Workforce Stability Dashboard (WSD).
  • Phase Five — Evaluation Planning: Built a measurement strategy with Kirkpatrick-aligned leading KPIs (mentoring hours, time-to-competency) and lagging outcome indicators (turnover rate, apprenticeship completion) tied directly to business performance.
Promo Video
Meet Marcus.
Before the methodology — the story that made it real. One apprentice, one company, one systemic failure hiding in plain sight.

Play Promo Video

Presentation & Materials
The Deliverables
The full slide deck, research report, and supporting documentation — available to view or download.
1-Pager Overview
At-a-glance overview of the performance gap, root cause findings, and integrated solution framework.
Judges Packet
Nine-section conference handout — final report, case one-pager, interventions, ROI analysis, implementation roadmap, and more.
Coming Soon Coming Soon
Full Research Report
Full HPT analysis — performance gap diagnosis, root cause findings, integrated interventions, evaluation framework, and ROI projections.
Presentation Slides
The full competition slide deck — findings, root cause analysis, and integrated solution design.
Solution Prototype
Real solutions to real problems — a working proof of concept for the integrated interventions.
Our Approach
Grounded in HPT
Three CPT competency domains. Ten ISPI principles. One non-negotiable rule: diagnose before you design.
01

Performance Analysis

We identify gaps, analyze organizational context, and conduct root cause analysis — diagnosing the real problem before ever selecting a solution.

"What is preventing desired performance — and why?"
02

Intervention Design

We select, design, and prototype solutions that blend training and non-training interventions — aligned to systems, constraints, and stakeholder needs.

"What combination of interventions will improve performance?"
03

Evaluation & Change

We build measurement strategies, evaluate outcomes, and support adoption — communicating results and adjusting based on evidence.

"Did it work — and how do we sustain it?"
+

ISPI Principles

Every decision is guided by the ISPI 10 Standards — systems thinking, cause-before-solution, evidence-based design, and ethical human impact.

Diagnosis before design. Always. ISPI Performance Standards ↗
The Team
Meet the Collective
Five practitioners. One shared conviction: define the right problem or the solution doesn't matter.
Criteria
How We're Evaluated
Eight dimensions. Each one tied to the rigor of our HPT process.

Full Rubric ↗

Problem Diagnosis
Systems-level root cause, not surface symptoms
Mindset Identification
Explicitly challenge the disposable workforce belief
Apprenticeship Design
Integrated performance system, not just training
Leadership Strategy
Culture & decision redesign, not generic training
Systems Integration
Fully integrated interventions, not point solutions
Use of Metrics
Business-aligned, measurable outcomes
Feasibility
Realistic, phased, constraint-aware solutions
Innovation
Creative but grounded — not idealistic
Schedule
Engagement Timeline
Ten weeks. One framework. End-to-end HPT applied.
Get in Touch
Connect with the Team
Have questions about our work? Reach out directly.
Alannah Fehrenbach
Project & Operations Specialist
Caroline Huxtable
Stakeholder Engagement Specialist
Kaleigh Ketelhut
Performance Improvement Consultant
Tammy Sanders
Performance Analysis Specialist
Ryne Tobar
Instructional & Media Designer